Pediatric Cranioplasty Patients With Hostile Reconstructive Environments: Split Calvarial Versus Prosthetic Implant.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric cranial defects can be preceded by prior infection, radiation therapy, failed prior cranioplasty, or cerebrospinal fluid leak, leading to a complex reconstructive environment. The primary aim of this study was to investigate differences in outcomes between pediatric patients with hostile reconstructive environments who received split-calvarial autologous grafts as opposed to prosthetic grafts in cranioplasty. METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of 51 patients younger than 18 years who underwent cranioplasty with a hostile setting between 1998 and 2020. Patients were then stratified into prosthetic (45%) and autologous groups (54%). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complication, defined as requirement of a subsequent surgery or revision. RESULTS: Overall, there were no significant differences in age, sex, type of hostile setting, etiology of cranial defect, or side of the cranial defect between the 2 groups. Complication rate among the 2 graft groups was 18%. However, there were no significant differences in complications, defined as infection, failure or resorption of the graft, wound breakdown or necrosis, resulting bone defect, or hematoma, between the 2 populations. There was a significant difference in etiology between patients with complications, with patients who required a cranioplasty due to previous hemicraniectomy being nearly 5 times as likely to face a complication ( P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, there was no significant difference observed in complications between prosthetic and split-thickness autologous grafts in pediatric patients with hostile settings. It does, however, seem that patients who had a previous hemicraniectomy are more likely to face complications as a result of cranioplasty.