Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing Patient's Values When Selecting Treatments for Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Drake, Lara; Han, Jane; Reyes-Hadsall, Sophia; Mostaghimi, Arash; Huang, Kathie.
Afiliação
  • Drake L; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Han J; Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Reyes-Hadsall S; Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
  • Mostaghimi A; University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Huang K; Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Skin Appendage Disord ; 9(2): 99-103, 2023 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36937159
Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that results in nonscarring hair loss. There is currently only one Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for AA; as a result, a wide range of treatments are commonly administered. This study aimed to determine how patients with AA prioritize treatment characteristics when choosing a therapy. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was distributed using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's (NAAF) email list. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board. Participants were asked to rank the importance of five treatment domains. Results: Of the 1,074 completed surveys (completion rate 77.4%), most respondents were female (85.4%) and white (77.8%) with an average age of 49.3 ± 15.4 years. Respondents had AA for an average of 17.7 ± 15.4 years, with 90.0% experiencing current active hair loss. 95.6% of respondents considered the treatment's ability to achieve hair regrowth as important, 93.9% listed the availability of information about the treatment (e.g., via doctor or online) as important, 89.1% ranked the treatment side effects as important, 75.7% the cost, and 68.0% the convenience of use. A sub-analysis was performed examining responses between respondents who identify as white versus nonwhite, which showed that while the order of importance was the same between groups, a significantly larger proportion of nonwhite respondents attributed higher importance to cost (white: 73.8%, nonwhite: 82.4%; p = 0.006) and convenience (white: 65.3%, nonwhite: 77.3%; p < 0.001) than their white counterparts. Discussion/Conclusion: These findings identify key domains that can serve as a starting point in shared decision-making between patients and physicians. This knowledge can streamline dermatologist delivery of key information and highlight areas of improvement for future therapeutics. Limitations include the nonrandomized NAAF population with most participants being white females. Future studies should confirm these findings in other patient populations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article