Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A novel, evidence-based, comprehensive clinical decision support system improves outcomes for patients with traumatic rib fractures.
Jones, Emma K; Ninkovic, Ivana; Bahr, Matthew; Dodge, Sarah; Doering, Michael; Martin, David; Ottosen, Julie; Allen, Tadashi; Melton, Genevieve B; Tignanelli, Christopher J.
Afiliação
  • Jones EK; From the Department of Surgery (E.K.J., D.M., G.B.M., C.J.T.), University of Minnesota; Fairview Health Services IT (I.N., S.D., G.B.M.); Trauma Services (M.B., M.D.), Fairview Health Services, Minneapolis; Department of Surgery (J.O.), Essentia Health, Duluth; Department of Radiology (T.A.), Institute for Health Informatics (G.B.M.), University of Minnesota; Fairview Health Services IT (G.B.M., C.J.T.); Center for Learning Health System Sciences (G.B.M., C.J.T.), University of Minnesota, Minnea
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 95(2): 161-171, 2023 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37012630
BACKGROUND: Traumatic rib fractures are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been shown to improve adherence to evidence-based (EB) practice and improve clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate if a rib fracture CDSS reduced hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day and 1-year mortality, unplanned ICU transfer, and the need for mechanical ventilation. The independent association of two process measures, an admission EB order set and a pain-inspiratory-cough score early warning system, with LOS were investigated. METHODS: The CDSS was scaled across nine US trauma centers. Following multiple imputation, multivariable regression models were fit to evaluate the association of the CDSS on primary and secondary outcomes. As a sensitivity analysis, propensity score matching was also performed to confirm regression findings. RESULTS: Overall, 3,279 patients met inclusion criteria. Rates of EB practices increased following implementation. On risk-adjusted analysis, in-hospital LOS preintervention versus postintervention was unchanged (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.15, p = 0.2) but unplanned transfer to the ICU was reduced (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.84, p = 0.024), as was 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.89, p = 0.01). Provider utilization of the admission order bundle was 45.3%. Utilization was associated with significantly reduced LOS (IRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; p = 0.019). The early warning system triggered on 34.4% of patients; however, was not associated with a significant reduction in hospital LOS (IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.06; p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: A novel, user-centered, comprehensive CDSS improves adherence to EB practice and is associated with a significant reduction in unplanned ICU admissions and possibly mortality, but not hospital LOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas das Costelas / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas das Costelas / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article