Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation.
Rodgers, Nicholas; Gerding, Bryn; Cusi, Vincenzo; Vaida, Florin; Tada, Yuko; Morris, Gerald P; Adler, Eric D; Stehlik, Josef; Kim, Paul J.
Afiliação
  • Rodgers N; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Gerding B; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Cusi V; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Vaida F; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
  • Tada Y; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Morris GP; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Adler ED; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Stehlik J; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Kim PJ; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 37(6): e14984, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37036133
BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of HTx only patients who underwent standard and expanded single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dd-cfDNA between October 2020 to January 2022. Comparison with GEP was also performed. Assays were compared for correlation, accurate classification, and prediction for AR. RESULTS: A total of 428 samples from 112 unique HTx patients were used for the study. A positive standard SNP correlated with the expanded SNP assay (p < .001). Both standard and expanded SNP tests showed low sensitivity (39%, p = 1.0) but high specificity (82% and 84%, p = 1.0) for AR. GEP did not improve sensitivity and showed worse specificity (p < .001) compared to standard dd-cfDNA. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference between standard and expanded SNP assays in detecting AR. We show improved specificity without change in sensitivity using dd-cfDNA in place of GEP testing. Prospective controlled studies to address how to best implement dd-cfDNA testing into clinical practice are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article