Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Limitations in utilization and prioritization of standardized somatosensory assessments after stroke: A cross-sectional survey of neurorehabilitation clinicians.
Hoh, Joanna Eskander; Borich, Michael R; Kesar, Trisha M; Reisman, Darcy S; Semrau, Jennifer A.
Afiliação
  • Hoh JE; Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, USA.
  • Borich MR; Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, USA.
  • Kesar TM; Center for Physical Therapy and Movement Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Reisman DS; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Semrau JA; Center for Physical Therapy and Movement Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Top Stroke Rehabil ; 31(1): 29-43, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37061928
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Somatosensory impairments are common after stroke, but receive limited evaluation and intervention during neurorehabilitation, despite negatively impacting functional movement and recovery.

OBJECTIVES:

Our objective was to understand the scope of somatosensory assessments used by clinicians in stroke rehabilitation, and barriers to increasing use in clinical practice.

METHODS:

An electronic survey was distributed to clinicians (physical therapists, occupational therapists, physicians, and nurses) who assessed at least one individual with stroke in the past 6 months. The survey included questions on evaluation procedures, type, and use of somatosensory assessments, as well as barriers and facilitators in clinical practice.

RESULTS:

Clinicians (N = 431) indicated greater familiarity with non-standardized assessments, and greater utilization compared to standardized assessments (p < 0.0001). Components of tactile sensation were the most commonly assessed modality of somatosensation (25%), while proprioception was rarely assessed (1%). Overall, assessments of motor function were prioritized over assessments of somatosensory function (p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION:

Respondents reported assessing somatosensation less frequently than motor function and demonstrated a reliance on rapid and coarse non-standardized assessments that ineffectively capture multi-modal somatosensory impairments, particularly for proprioceptive deficits common post-stroke. In general, clinicians were not familiar with standardized somatosensory assessments, and this knowledge gap likely contributes to lack of translation of these assessments into practice.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinicians utilize somatosensory assessments that inadequately capture the multi-modal nature of somatosensory impairments in stroke survivors. Addressing barriers to clinical translation has the potential to increase utilization of standardized assessments to improve the characterization of somatosensory deficits that inform clinical decision-making toward enhancing stroke rehabilitation outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article