Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the best target in a treat-to-target strategy in rheumatoid arthritis? Results from a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
Messelink, Marianne A; den Broeder, Alfons A; Marinelli, Florine E; Michgels, Edwin; Verschueren, P; Aletaha, Daniel; Tekstra, Janneke; Welsing, Paco M J.
Afiliação
  • Messelink MA; Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • den Broeder AA; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.
  • Marinelli FE; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.
  • Michgels E; Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Verschueren P; Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Aletaha D; Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Tekstra J; Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Welsing PMJ; Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands p.m.j.welsing@umcutrecht.nl.
RMD Open ; 9(2)2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116986
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

A treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has been shown to be superior to usual care in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the optimal target remains unknown. Targets are based on a disease activity measure (eg, Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Indices/Clinical Disease Activity Indices (SDAI/CDAI), and a cut-off such as remission or low disease activity (LDA). Our aim was to compare the effect of different targets on clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS:

Cochrane, Embase and (pre)MEDLINE databases were searched (1 June 2022) for randomised controlled trials and cohort studies after 2003 that applied T2T in RA patients for ≥12 months. Data were extracted from individual T2T study arms; risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Using meta-regression, we evaluated the effect of the target used on clinical and radiographic outcomes, correcting for heterogeneity between and within studies.

RESULTS:

115 treatment arms were used in the meta-regression analyses. Aiming for SDAI/CDAI-LDA was statistically superior to targeting DAS-LDA regarding DAS-remission and SDAI/CDAI/Boolean-remission outcomes over 1-3 years. Aiming for SDAI/CDAI-LDA was also significantly superior to DAS-remission regarding both SDAI/CDAI/Boolean-remission (over 1-3 years) and mean SDAI/CDAI (over 1 year). Targeting DAS-remission rather than DAS-LDA only improved the percentage of patients in DAS-remission, and only statistically significantly after 2-3 years of T2T. No differences were observed in Health Assessment Questionnaire and radiographic progression.

CONCLUSIONS:

Targeting SDAI/CDAI-LDA, and to a lesser extent DAS-remission, may be superior to targeting DAS-LDA regarding several clinical outcomes. However, due to the risk of residual confounding and the lack of data on (over)treatment and safety, future studies should aim to directly and comprehensively compare targets. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021249015.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Antirreumáticos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Antirreumáticos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article