Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
Wahba, Adam J; Phillips, Nick; Mathew, Ryan K; Hutchinson, Peter J; Helmy, Adel; Cromwell, David A.
Afiliação
  • Wahba AJ; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, UK. ADAM.WAHBA@NHS.NET.
  • Phillips N; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. ADAM.WAHBA@NHS.NET.
  • Mathew RK; Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
  • Hutchinson PJ; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Helmy A; Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
  • Cromwell DA; Department of Research, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, UK.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 165(7): 1695-1706, 2023 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37243824
BACKGROUND: Surgical mortality indicators should be risk-adjusted when evaluating the performance of organisations. This study evaluated the performance of risk-adjustment models that used English hospital administrative data for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2018. Organisational-level 30-day mortality was calculated for selected subspecialties (neuro-oncology, neurovascular and trauma neurosurgery) and the overall cohort. Risk adjustment models were developed using multivariable logistic regression and incorporated various patient variables: age, sex, admission method, social deprivation, comorbidity and frailty indices. Performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: The cohort included 49,044 patients. Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 4.9%, with unadjusted organisational rates ranging from 3.2 to 9.3%. The variables in the best performing models varied for the subspecialties; for trauma neurosurgery, a model that included deprivation and frailty had the best calibration, while for neuro-oncology a model with these variables plus comorbidity performed best. For neurovascular surgery, a simple model of age, sex and admission method performed best. Levels of discrimination varied for the subspecialties (range: 0.583 for trauma and 0.740 for neurovascular). The models were generally well calibrated. Application of the models to the organisation figures produced an average (median) absolute change in mortality of 0.33% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.15-0.72) for the overall cohort model. Median changes for the subspecialty models were 0.29% (neuro-oncology, IQR 0.15-0.42), 0.40% (neurovascular, IQR 0.24-0.78) and 0.49% (trauma neurosurgery, IQR 0.23-1.68). CONCLUSIONS: Reasonable risk-adjustment models for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery procedures were possible using variables from HES, although the models for trauma neurosurgery performed less well. Including a measure of frailty often improved model performance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Neurocirurgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Neurocirurgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article