Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Focal pulsed field ablation and ultrahigh-density mapping - versatile tools for all atrial arrhythmias? Initial procedural experiences.
Ruwald, Martin H; Johannessen, Arne; Hansen, Morten Lock; Haugdal, Martin; Worck, Rene; Hansen, Jim.
Afiliação
  • Ruwald MH; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark. mruwald@hotmail.com.
  • Johannessen A; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Hansen ML; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Haugdal M; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Worck R; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Hansen J; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 67(1): 99-109, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37249807
BACKGROUND: Focal pulsed field ablation (FPFA) is a novel and promising method of cardiac ablation. The aim of this study was to report the feasibility, short-term safety, and procedural findings for a broad spectrum of ablated atrial arrhythmias. METHODS: Patients (n = 51) scheduled for ablation of atrial arrhythmias were prospectively included and underwent FPFA using the Galvanize CENTAURI generator with energy delivery through commercially available ablation catheters with ultrahigh-density (UHDx) 3D electroanatomic voltage/local activation time map evaluations. Workflow, procedural data, and peri-procedural technical errors and complications are described. RESULTS: Planned ablation strategy was achieved with FPFA-only in 48/51 (94%) of the cases. Ablation strategy was first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 17/51 (36%), repeat ablation in 18/51 (38%), PVI + in 13/51 (28%), and cavotricuspid isthmus block (CTI)-only in 3/51 (6%). The mean procedure time was 104 ± 31 min (first-time PVI), 114 ± 26 min (repeat procedure), 152 ± 36 min (PVI +), and 62 ± 17 min (CTI). Mean UHDx mapping time to assess lesion formation and block after ablation was 7 ± 4 min with 5485 ± 4809 points. First pass acute (linear) isolation with bidirectional block for anatomical lesion sets was 120/124 (97%) for all PVs, 17/17 (100%) for (any) isthmus, and 14/17 (82%) for left atrium posterior wall (LAPW). We observed several time-consuming integration errors with the used ablation system (mean 3.4 ± 3.7 errors/procedure), one transient inferior ST elevation when ablating CTI resolved by intravenous nitroglycerine and one transient AV block requiring temporary pacing for > 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: FPFA was a highly versatile method to treat atrial arrhythmias with high first-pass efficiency. UHDx revealed acute homogenous low-voltage lesions in ablated areas. More data is needed to establish lesion durability and limitations of FPFA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias Pulmonares / Fibrilação Atrial / Flutter Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias Pulmonares / Fibrilação Atrial / Flutter Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article