Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and radiologic outcomes of Lima ProMade custom 3D-printed glenoid components in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Rashid, Mustafa S; Cunningham, Lindsay; Shields, David W; Walton, Michael J; Monga, Puneet; Bale, Richard S; Trail, Ian A.
Afiliação
  • Rashid MS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, UK. Electronic address: mustafa.rashid@nhs.net.
  • Cunningham L; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.
  • Shields DW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.
  • Walton MJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.
  • Monga P; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.
  • Bale RS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.
  • Trail IA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, UK.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 32(10): 2017-2026, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37263477
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients undergoing primary or revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using custom 3D-printed components to manage severe glenoid bone loss with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Following ethical approval, patients were identified and invited to participate. Inclusion criteria were (1) severe glenoid bone loss necessitating the need for custom implants and (2) patients with definitive glenoid and humeral components implanted more than 2 years prior. Included patients underwent clinical assessment using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH). Radiographic assessment included anteroposterior and axial projections. Patients were invited to attend a computed tomography (CT) scan to confirm osseointegration. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation [SD]) and paired t test for parametric data. RESULTS: Eleven patients declined to participate. Five patients were deceased prior to study commencement, leaving 42 remaining patients in this analysis. Three patients had revision surgery before the 2-year follow-up; of these, 2 retained their custom glenoid components. Mean follow-up was 31.6 months from surgery (range 24-52 months). All 4 scores improved: OSS from a mean 15 (SD 8.4) to 36 (SD 12) (P < .001), Constant-Murley score from a mean 15 (SD 11.2) to 52 (SD 20.1) (P < .001), QuickDASH from a mean 70 (SD 21) to 31 (SD 24.8) (P = .004), and the ASES score from a mean 22 (SD 17.8) to 71 (SD 23.3) (P = .007). Radiologic evaluation demonstrated good osseointegration in all but 1 included patient. CONCLUSION: The utility of custom 3D-printed components for managing severe glenoid bone loss in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yields significant clinical improvements in this complex cohort. Large complex glenoid bone defects can be managed successfully with custom 3D-printed glenoid components.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Cavidade Glenoide / Artroplastia do Ombro Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Cavidade Glenoide / Artroplastia do Ombro Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article