Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone.
Sprague, Brian L; Ichikawa, Laura; Eavey, Joanna; Lowry, Kathryn P; Rauscher, Garth; O'Meara, Ellen S; Miglioretti, Diana L; Chen, Shuai; Lee, Janie M; Stout, Natasha K; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S; Alsheik, Nila; Herschorn, Sally D; Perry, Hannah; Weaver, Donald L; Kerlikowske, Karla.
Afiliação
  • Sprague BL; Office of Health Promotion Research, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Ichikawa L; Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Eavey J; University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Lowry KP; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Rauscher G; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • O'Meara ES; Department of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Miglioretti DL; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Chen S; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Lee JM; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Stout NK; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
  • Mandelblatt JS; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
  • Alsheik N; Department of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Herschorn SD; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Perry H; Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Weaver DL; Advocate Caldwell Breast Center, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois, USA.
  • Kerlikowske K; Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Cancer ; 129(16): 2456-2468, 2023 08 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37303202
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are no consensus guidelines for supplemental breast cancer screening with whole-breast ultrasound. However, criteria for women at high risk of mammography screening failures (interval invasive cancer or advanced cancer) have been identified. Mammography screening failure risk was evaluated among women undergoing supplemental ultrasound screening in clinical practice compared with women undergoing mammography alone.

METHODS:

A total of 38,166 screening ultrasounds and 825,360 screening mammograms without supplemental screening were identified during 2014-2020 within three Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries. Risk of interval invasive cancer and advanced cancer were determined using BCSC prediction models. High interval invasive breast cancer risk was defined as heterogeneously dense breasts and BCSC 5-year breast cancer risk ≥2.5% or extremely dense breasts and BCSC 5-year breast cancer risk ≥1.67%. Intermediate/high advanced cancer risk was defined as BCSC 6-year advanced breast cancer risk ≥0.38%.

RESULTS:

A total of 95.3% of 38,166 ultrasounds were among women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts, compared with 41.8% of 825,360 screening mammograms without supplemental screening (p < .0001). Among women with dense breasts, high interval invasive breast cancer risk was prevalent in 23.7% of screening ultrasounds compared with 18.5% of screening mammograms without supplemental imaging (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.30-1.39); intermediate/high advanced cancer risk was prevalent in 32.0% of screening ultrasounds versus 30.5% of screening mammograms without supplemental screening (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS:

Ultrasound screening was highly targeted to women with dense breasts, but only a modest proportion were at high mammography screening failure risk. A clinically significant proportion of women undergoing mammography screening alone were at high mammography screening failure risk.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article