Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of an automatic software in assessing fetal brain volume from three dimensional ultrasonographic volumes: Comparison with manual analysis.
Lu, Jia Li Angela; Resta, Serena; Marra, Maria Chiara; Patelli, Chiara; Stefanachi, Vitaliana; Rizzo, Giuseppe.
Afiliação
  • Lu JLA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Resta S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Marra MC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Patelli C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Veroma, Verona, Italy.
  • Stefanachi V; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Rizzo G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 51(7): 1146-1151, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37307382
OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to test the agreement between a manual and an automatic technique in measuring fetal brain volume (FBV) from three-dimensional (3D) fetal head datasets. METHODS: FBV were acquired independently by two operators from low risk singleton pregnancies at a gestational age between 19 and 34 weeks. FBV measurements were obtained using an automatic software (Smart ICV™) and manually by Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL™). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess reliability, while bias and agreement were evaluate by examining Bland-Altman plots. The time spent in measuring volumes was calculated and values obtained compared. RESULTS: Sixty-three volumes were considered for the study. In all the included volumes successful volume analysis were obtained with both techniques. Smart ICV™ showed a high intra-observer (0.996; 95% CI 0.994-0.998) and inter-observer (ICC 0.995; 95% CI 0.991-0.997). An excellent degree of reliability was found when the two techniques were compared (ICC 0.995; 95% CI 0.987-0.998). The time required to perform FBV was significantly lower for Smart ICV™ than VOCAL™ (8.2 ± 4.5 vs. 121.3 ± 19.0 s; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of FBV is feasible with both manual and automatic techniques. Smart ICV™ showed an excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability associated with a valuable agreement with volume measurements obtained manually with VOCAL™. Volumes may be measured significantly faster with smart ICV™ than manually and this automatic software has the potential to become the preferred methods for the assessment of FBV.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article