Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine Learning Improves the Prediction of Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma.
Tabari, Azadeh; Cox, Meredith; D'Amore, Brian; Mansur, Arian; Dabbara, Harika; Boland, Genevieve; Gee, Michael S; Daye, Dania.
Afiliação
  • Tabari A; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
  • Cox M; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
  • D'Amore B; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
  • Mansur A; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
  • Dabbara H; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
  • Boland G; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
  • Gee MS; Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
  • Daye D; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(10)2023 May 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37345037
ABSTRACT
Pretreatment LDH is a standard prognostic biomarker for advanced melanoma and is associated with response to ICI. We assessed the role of machine learning-based radiomics in predicting responses to ICI and in complementing LDH for prognostication of metastatic melanoma. From 2008-2022, 79 patients with 168 metastatic hepatic lesions were identified. All patients had arterial phase CT images 1-month prior to initiation of ICI. Response to ICI was assessed on follow-up CT at 3 months using RECIST criteria. A machine learning algorithm was developed using radiomics. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) was used to select features. ROC analysis and logistic regression analyses evaluated performance. Shapley additive explanations were used to identify the variables that are the most important in predicting a response. mRMR selection revealed 15 features that are associated with a response to ICI. The machine learning model combining both radiomics features and pretreatment LDH resulted in better performance for response prediction compared to models that included radiomics or LDH alone (AUC of 0.89 (95% CI [0.76-0.99]) vs. 0.81 (95% CI [0.65-0.94]) and 0.81 (95% CI [0.72-0.91]), respectively). Using SHAP analysis, LDH and two GLSZM were the most predictive of the outcome. Pre-treatment CT radiomic features performed equally well to serum LDH in predicting treatment response.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article