Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pharmacists' perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study.
Yeung, Kingston W C M; Lee, Samantha K M; Bin, Yu Sun; Cheung, Janet M Y.
Afiliação
  • Yeung KWCM; Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building (A15), Science Road, Camperdown Campus, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
  • Lee SKM; Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building (A15), Science Road, Camperdown Campus, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
  • Bin YS; Sleep and Circadian Research Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, 431 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, Sydney, NSW, 2037, Australia.
  • Cheung JMY; Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 45(5): 1153-1166, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37354280
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In Australia, prescription melatonin became a 'Pharmacist Only Medicine' for people over 55 with insomnia from June 2021. However, little is known about pharmacists' views on melatonin down-scheduling and perceived impacts on practice.

AIM:

To explore Australian community pharmacists' views on and attitudes towards the down-scheduling of melatonin.

METHOD:

A convenience sample of community pharmacists and pharmacy interns were recruited. Participants completed a survey capturing demographic and professional practice details, and rated their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards melatonin. This was followed by an online semi-structured interview. Interviews were guided by a schedule of questions developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and explored the perceived role of melatonin, preparation/response to down-scheduling, practice changes and patient interactions. Interviews continued until data saturation and were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Approach.

RESULTS:

Twenty-four interviews were conducted with community pharmacists (n = 19) and intern pharmacists (n = 5), all practicing in metropolitan areas. Pharmacists/intern pharmacists welcomed the increased accessibility of melatonin for patients. However, pharmacists perceived a disconnect between the guidelines, supply protocols and pack sizes with practice, making it difficult to monitor patient use of melatonin. The miscommunication of eligibility also contributed to patient-pharmacist tension when supply was denied. Importantly, most participants indicated their interest in upskilling their knowledge in melatonin use in sleep, specifically formulation differences and dosage titration.

CONCLUSION:

While pharmacists welcomed the down-scheduling of melatonin, several challenges were noted, contributing to pharmacist-patient tensions in practice. Findings highlight the need to refine and unify melatonin supply protocols and amend pack sizes to reflect guideline recommendations as well as better educating the public about the risk-benefits of melatonin.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia / Melatonina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia / Melatonina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article