Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A nationwide analysis.
Watanabe, Atsuyuki; Malik, Aaqib; Aikawa, Tadao; Briasoulis, Alexandros; Kuno, Toshiki.
Afiliação
  • Watanabe A; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA.
  • Malik A; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
  • Aikawa T; Department of Cardiology, Hokkaido Cardiovascular Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Briasoulis A; Department of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Kuno T; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Heart Failure and Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Med Virol ; 95(7): e28961, 2023 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37477642
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to elucidate the association between ECMO and mortality in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS in the nationwide setting. United States National Inpatient Sample was used to identify mechanically ventilated adults for COVID-19 with ARDS. We divided them into three groups according to the use of ECMO (i.e., no-ECMO, venovenous [VV]-ECMO, and venoarterial [VA]-ECMO). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while the secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the total costs during hospitalization. We performed a stepwise logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and severity. We included 68 795 (mean age [SD]: 63.5 [0.1]), 3280 (mean age [SD]: 48.7 [0.5]), and 340 (mean age [SD]: 43.3 [2.1]) patients who received no-, VV-, and VA-ECMO, respectively. The logistic regression analysis did not show significant associations between the use of VV-/VA-ECMO and mortality (adjusted odds ratio with no-ECMO as reference [95% confidence interval]: 1.03 [0.86-1.24] and 1.18 [0.64-2.15], respectively). While LOS was longest with VV-ECMO, the total costs were highest with VA-ECMO. In conclusion, our study found no association between the use of ECMO and mortality of COVID-19-associated ARDS in the nationwide setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea / COVID-19 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea / COVID-19 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article