Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The relative value of Pre-Implementation stages for successful implementation of evidence-informed programs.
Alley, Zoe M; Chapman, Jason E; Schaper, Holle; Saldana, Lisa.
Afiliação
  • Alley ZM; Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
  • Chapman JE; Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
  • Schaper H; Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
  • Saldana L; Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA. lsaldana@chestnut.org.
Implement Sci ; 18(1): 30, 2023 07 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37480144
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Most implementations fail before the corresponding services are ever delivered. Measuring implementation process fidelity may reveal when and why these attempts fail. This knowledge is necessary to support the achievement of positive implementation milestones, such as delivering services to clients (program start-up) and competency in treatment delivery. The present study evaluates the extent to which implementation process fidelity at different implementation stages predicts achievement of those milestones.

METHODS:

Implementation process fidelity data-as measured by the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)-from 1287 implementing sites across 27 evidence-informed programs were examined in mixed effects regression models with sites nested within programs. Implementation process fidelity, as measured by the proportion of implementation activities completed during the three stages of the SIC Pre-Implementation phase and overall Pre-Implementation (Phase 1) and Implementation (Phase 2) proportion scores, was assessed as a predictor of sites achieving program start-up (i.e., delivering services) and competency in program delivery.

RESULTS:

The predicted probability of start-up across all sites was low at 35% (95% CI [33%, 38%]). When considering the evidence-informed program being implemented, that probability was nearly twice as high (64%; 95% CI [42%, 82%]), and 57% of the total variance in program start-up was attributable to the program. Implementation process fidelity was positively and significantly associated with achievement of program start-up and competency. The magnitude of this relationship varied significantly across programs for Pre-Implementation Stage 1 (i.e., Engagement) only. Compared to other stages, completing more Pre-Implementation Stage 3 (Readiness Planning) activities resulted in the most rapid gains in probability of achieving program start-up. The predicted probability of achieving competency was very low unless sites had high scores in both Pre-Implementation and Implementation phases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Strong implementation process fidelity-as measured by SIC Pre-Implementation and Implementation phase proportion scores-was associated with sites' achievement of program start-up and competency in program delivery, with early implementation process fidelity being especially potent. These findings highlight the importance of a rigorous Pre-Implementation process.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article