Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Vortex Effect in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Ito, Willian E; Prokop, Dillon J; Ito, Mario C; Whiles, Bristol B; Neff, Donald A; Duchene, David A; Molina, Wilson R.
Afiliação
  • Ito WE; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS.
  • Prokop DJ; The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS.
  • Ito MC; State University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Whiles BB; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS.
  • Neff DA; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS.
  • Duchene DA; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS.
  • Molina WR; Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS. Electronic address: wmolina@kumc.edu.
Urology ; 180: 74-80, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482100
OBJECTIVE: To describe the physical principles of the vortex effect to better understand its applicability in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) procedures. METHODS: Two acrylic phantom models were built based on the cross-sectional area (CSA) ratio of a MIP nephroscope and access sheaths (15/16F and 21/22F MIP-M, Karl Storz). The nephroscope phantom was 10 mm in diameter. The access sheaths had diameters of 14 mm (CSA ratio: 0.69) and 20 mm (CSA ratio: 0.30). The models were adapted to generate hydrolysis, and hydrogen bubbles enhanced flow visualization on a green laser background. After calibration, the experimental flow rate was set to 12.0 mL/s. Three 30-second trials assessing the flow were performed with each model. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were completed to determine the speed and pressure profiles. RESULTS: In both models, as the incoming fluid from the nephroscope phantom attempted to move toward the collecting system, a stagnation point was demonstrated. No fluid entered the collecting system phantom. Utilizing the 14 mm sheath, we observed a random generation of several vortices and a pressure gradient (PG) of 114.4 N/m2 between the nephroscope's tip and stagnation point. In contrast, examining the 20 mm sheath revealed a significantly smaller PG (19.4 N/m2) and no noticeable vortices were noted. CONCLUSION: The speed of the fluid and equipment geometry regulate the PG and the vortices field, which are responsible for the production of the vortex effect. Considering the same flow rate, a higher ratio between the CSA of the nephroscope and access sheath results in improved efficacy of the vortex effect.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article