Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Parametric modeling study for blown-dust secondary pollution and optimal ventilation velocity during tunnel construction.
Guo, Jinnan; Li, Angui; Wang, Tianqi; Gao, Ran; Wu, Dingmeng; Yin, Yifei; Li, Jiaxing; Hu, Jing.
Afiliação
  • Guo J; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
  • Li A; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China. Electronic address: liag@xauat.edu.cn.
  • Wang T; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
  • Gao R; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
  • Wu D; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
  • Yin Y; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
  • Li J; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
  • Hu J; School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Environ Pollut ; 335: 122239, 2023 Oct 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482333
ABSTRACT
Tunnel construction often relies on drilling and blasting. High dust pollution is one of the primary problems of drilling and blasting construction. The level of secondary blown dust pollution caused by ventilation matches that of dust pollution caused by drilling construction. In this study, a critical flow model and blown dust rate model for deposited dust were established via force analysis, which was validated against the test data. The research results showed that the characteristic airflow velocity for blowing dust particles with a 100 µm diameter reached approximately 0.42 m/s for tunnel diameter is 10 m, and the ventilation Re values under smooth and rough conditions were 2.3 × 105 and 1.4 × 105, respectively. Furthermore, when ventilation Re reached 4 × 105, the blown dust pollution rate caused by ventilation under smooth conditions was approximately 1.8 × 10-2 kg/s. If dust particle size is more or less the critical dust particle size, the characteristic airflow velocity was increased. Moreover, the optimal velocity at which the deposited dust does not flow or move during tunnel construction was related to the tunnel size and roughness. For the smooth tunnel with a diameter of 10 m, the optimal ventilation velocity was 3.5 m/s. When the tunnel roughness was increased from 0.005 to 0.5 m, the optimal ventilation velocity decreased from 3.3 to 1.6 m/s. The deposited dust critical flow model and blown dust pollution rate model established in this study provide a sound theoretical basis for selecting the optimal velocity of tunnel ventilation and recognizing the risks of secondary blown dust pollution due to ventilation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exposição Ocupacional / Poeira Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exposição Ocupacional / Poeira Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article