Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases.
Schulz, Sabine; Harzheim, Laura; Hübner, Constanze; Lorke, Mariya; Jünger, Saskia; Buchholz, Annika; Frech, Stefanie; Steffens, Melanie; Woopen, Christiane.
Afiliação
  • Schulz S; Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Universitätsstraße 91, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
  • Harzheim L; Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Universitätsstraße 91, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
  • Hübner C; Center for Life Ethics, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
  • Lorke M; Faculty of Engineering and Mathematics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSBI), 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.
  • Jünger S; Department of Community Health, University of Applied Health Sciences Bochum, Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
  • Buchholz A; Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  • Frech S; Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Str. 140, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
  • Steffens M; Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  • Woopen C; Center for Life Ethics, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37510590
ABSTRACT
In the process of developing and implementing innovative implant technologies the consideration of patient preferences can be beneficial for patients, doctors and developers. Nevertheless, in existing literature, there is still scarce knowledge of patients' perspectives on long-term implant care. In this study, three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were conducted in the context of cochlear implants (CI, n = 92), glaucoma implants (GI, n = 21) and cardiovascular implants (CVI, n = 23), examining the relative importance of attributes of long-term implant care from the patients' perspective. The participants chose between differently shaped options for implant-related care. The attributes of these care options were generated and selected based on previous literature reviews, group discussions and a diary study with patients. The choice data were analyzed via binary logit regression. In CI-DCE, the technological compatibility of the implant with newer implant models, accessories or devices from other manufacturers was highly valued by participants, whereas in GI-DCE the (in)dependency on glaucoma medication post-implantation had the greatest influence on participants' choice behavior. In CVI-DCE, the attribute with the highest relative importance related to the means of securing long-term treatment success. In all three DCE, shared decision making was relatively important for participants. Our results emphasized the importance of an adequate transfer of technological advancements in implant care for promoting patient benefits, such as the availability of comprehensible, understandable, high-quality information about current developments. Similarly, promoting technological health literacy and further pushing the technological compatibility, durability and safety of implants are directions for future implant development in accordance with patients' preferences. Therefore, the participation of implant wearers in the development process is encouraged.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Doenças Cardiovasculares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Doenças Cardiovasculares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article