Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Switching to Higher-Valency Pediatric Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in the United Kingdom.
Wilson, Michele; Lucas, Aaron; Mendes, Diana; Vyse, Andrew; Mikudina, Boglarka; Czudek, Carole; Ellsbury, Gillian Frances; Perdrizet, Johnna.
Afiliação
  • Wilson M; RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC 27709, USA.
  • Lucas A; RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC 27709, USA.
  • Mendes D; Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Surrey, Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK.
  • Vyse A; Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Surrey, Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK.
  • Mikudina B; Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Surrey, Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK.
  • Czudek C; Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Surrey, Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK.
  • Ellsbury GF; Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Surrey, Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK.
  • Perdrizet J; Pfizer Inc., 66 Hudson Blvd E, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(7)2023 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37514984
ABSTRACT
Currently, the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) is administered under a 1+1 (1 primary dose) pediatric schedule in the United Kingdom (UK). Higher-valency PCVs, 15-valent PCV (PCV15), or 20-valent PCV (PCV20) might be considered to expand serotype coverage. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCV20 or PCV15 using either a 2+1 (2 primary doses) or 1+1 schedule for pediatric immunization in the UK. Using a dynamic transmission model, we simulated future disease incidence and costs under PCV13 1+1, PCV20 2+1, PCV20 1+1, PCV15 2+1, and PCV15 1+1 schedules from the UK National Health Service perspective. We prospectively estimated disease cases, direct costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Scenario analyses were performed to estimate the impact of model assumptions and parameter uncertainty. Over a five-year period, PCV20 2+1 averted the most disease cases and gained the most additional QALYs. PCV20 2+1 and 1+1 were dominant (cost-saving and more QALYs gained) compared with PCV15 (2+1 or 1+1) and PCV13 1+1. PCV20 2+1 was cost-effective (GBP 8110/QALY) compared with PCV20 1+1. PCV20 was found cost-saving compared with PCV13 1+1, and PCV20 2+1 was cost-effective compared with PCV20 1+1. Policymakers should consider the reduction in disease cases with PCV20, which may offset vaccination costs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article