Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Second-hand smoke exposure and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malevolti, Maria Chiara; Maci, Caterina; Lugo, Alessandra; Possenti, Irene; Gallus, Silvano; Gorini, Giuseppe; Carreras, Giulia.
Afiliação
  • Malevolti MC; Oncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, 50139, Florence, Italy.
  • Maci C; Oncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, 50139, Florence, Italy.
  • Lugo A; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Possenti I; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Gallus S; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Gorini G; Oncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, 50139, Florence, Italy.
  • Carreras G; Oncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, 50139, Florence, Italy. g.carreras@ispro.toscana.it.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(15): 14353-14363, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516982
PURPOSE: The association between second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure and cervical cancer (CC) risk is still unclear. The aim of this study is to provide an accurate and updated estimate of this association. METHODS: Through an original methodology to identify original publications, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all epidemiological studies published up to October 2022 evaluating the association between SHS exposure and CC risk among female non-smokers. Meta-analytic estimates were obtained using random-effects models and dose-response relationships were derived using log-linear functions. RESULTS: Out of 25 eligible studies, 21 were included in the meta-analysis, providing a pooled relative risk (RR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of grade 2 or higher of 1.52 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.30-1.78, 21 studies) for overall SHS exposure versus non-exposure. When restricting the analysis to invasive CC, the pooled RR was 1.42 (95% CI 1.17-1.71, 13 studies), whereas the pooled RR for CIN was 1.50 (95% CI 1.22-1.84, 6 studies). Analyzing RR by setting or source of SHS exposure resulted in significant associations with CC risk for SHS exposure at home (RR for CIN2+ 1.49, 95% CI 1.21-1.84, 14 studies), in non-specified settings (RR for CIN2+ 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.23, 8 studies) and from partner (RR for CIN2+ 1.55, 95% CI 1.25-1.94, 10 studies). The risk of CIN2+ significantly increased linearly with the intensity and pack-years of SHS exposure. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive review and meta-analysis confirmed the association of SHS exposure with CC, further suggesting the need to raise concern about SHS exposure in the population.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article