Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping the sociodemographic distribution and self-reported justifications for non-compliance with COVID-19 guidelines in the United Kingdom.
Balaeț, Maria; Kurtin, Danielle L; Gruia, Dragos C; Lerede, Annalaura; Custovic, Darije; Trender, William; Jolly, Amy E; Hellyer, Peter J; Hampshire, Adam.
Afiliação
  • Balaeț M; Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kurtin DL; Neuromodulation Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
  • Gruia DC; Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lerede A; Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Custovic D; UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in AI for Healthcare, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Trender W; Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Jolly AE; UK Dementia Research Institute: Care Research & Technology, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hellyer PJ; Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hampshire A; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council CDT Neurotechnology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol ; 14: 1183789, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37539003
ABSTRACT
Which population factors have predisposed people to disregard government safety guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic and what justifications do they give for this non-compliance? To address these questions, we analyse fixed-choice and free-text responses to survey questions about compliance and government handling of the pandemic, collected from tens of thousands of members of the UK public at three 6-monthly timepoints. We report that sceptical opinions about the government and mainstream-media narrative, especially as pertaining to justification for guidelines, significantly predict non-compliance. However, free text topic modelling shows that such opinions are diverse, spanning from scepticism about government competence and self-interest to full-blown conspiracy theories, and covary in prevalence with sociodemographic variables. These results indicate that attempts to counter non-compliance through argument should account for this diversity in peoples' underlying opinions, and inform conversations aimed at bridging the gap between the general public and bodies of authority accordingly.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article