Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Scoping Review of Interventions to De-implement Potentially Harmful Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Healthcare Settings.
Rockwell, Michelle S; Oyese, Emma G; Singh, Eshika; Vinson, Matthew; Yim, Isaiah; Turner, Jamie K; Epling, John W.
Afiliação
  • Rockwell MS; Department of Family & Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.
  • Oyese EG; Department of Family & Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.
  • Singh E; Department of Family & Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.
  • Vinson M; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.
  • Yim I; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.
  • Turner JK; Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health Graduate Program, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA.
  • Epling JW; Department of Family & Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.
medRxiv ; 2023 Jul 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37546911
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Potentially harmful nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) utilization persists at undesirable rates throughout the world. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings and to suggest directions for future research.

Design:

Scoping review. Data Sources PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar (2000-2022). Study Selection Studies reporting on the effectiveness of interventions to systematically reduce potentially harmful NSAID utilization in healthcare settings. Data Extraction Using Covidence systematic review software, we extracted study and intervention characteristics, including the effectiveness of interventions in reducing NSAID utilization.

Results:

From 7,818 articles initially identified, 68 were included in the review. Most studies took place in European countries (45.6%) or the U.S. (35.3%), with randomized controlled trial as the most common design (55.9%). The majority of studies (76.2%) reported a reduction in the utilization of potentially harmful NSAIDs. Interventions were largely clinician-facing (76.2%) and delivered in primary care (60.2%). Academic detailing, clinical decision support or electronic medical record interventions, performance reports, and pharmacist review were frequent approaches employed. NSAID use was most commonly classified as potentially harmful based on patients' age (55.8%) or history of gastrointestinal disorders (47.1%) or kidney disease (38.2%). Only 7.4% of interventions focused on over-the-counter NSAIDs in addition to prescription. Few studies (5.9%) evaluated pain or quality of life following NSAIDs discontinuation.

Conclusion:

Many varied interventions are effective in de-implementing potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings. Efforts to adapt, scale, and disseminate these interventions are needed. In addition, future interventions should address over-the-counter NSAIDs, which are broadly available and widely used. Evaluating unintended consequences of interventions, including patient-focused outcomes, is another important priority.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article