Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Structural Foot Characteristics in People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis: Cross-Sectional Findings From the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot.
Lithgow, Merridy J; Buldt, Andrew K; Munteanu, Shannon E; Marshall, Michelle; Thomas, Martin J; Peat, George; Roddy, Edward; Menz, Hylton B.
Afiliação
  • Lithgow MJ; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Buldt AK; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Munteanu SE; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Marshall M; Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Thomas MJ; Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Peat G; Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Burslem, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Roddy E; Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Menz HB; Centre for Applied Health and Social Care (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 76(2): 225-230, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37563733
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study compared radiographic measures of foot structure between people with and without symptomatic radiographic midfoot osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional study of adults aged 50 years and older registered with four UK general practices who reported foot pain in the past year. Bilateral weightbearing dorsoplantar and lateral radiographs were obtained. Symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA was defined as midfoot pain in the last 4 weeks, combined with radiographic OA in one or more midfoot joints (first cuneometatarsal, second cuneometatarsal, navicular-first cuneiform, and talonavicular). Midfoot OA cases were matched 11 for sex and age to controls with a 5-year age tolerance. Eleven radiographic measures were extracted and compared between the groups using independent sample t-tests and effect sizes (Cohen's d).

RESULTS:

We identified 63 midfoot OA cases (mean ± SD age was 66.8 ± 8.0 years, with 32 male and 31 female participants) and matched these to 63 controls (mean ± SD age was 65.9 ± 7.8 years). There were no differences in metatarsal lengths between the groups. However, those with midfoot OA had a higher calcaneal-first metatarsal angle (d = 0.43, small effect size, P = 0.018) and lower calcaneal inclination angle (d = 0.46, small effect size, P = 0.011) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS:

People with midfoot OA have a flatter foot posture compared with controls. Although caution is required when inferring causation from cross-sectional data, these findings are consistent with a pathomechanical pathway linking foot structure to the development of midfoot OA. Prospective studies are required to determine the temporal relationships between foot structure, function, and the development of this common and disabling condition.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite / Pé Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite / Pé Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article