Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial.
Coronado, Gloria D; Nyongesa, Denis B; Escaron, Anne L; Petrik, Amanda F; Thompson, Jamie H; Smith, Dave; Davis, Melinda M; Schneider, Jennifer L; Rivelli, Jennifer S; Laguna, Tanya; Leo, Michael C.
Afiliação
  • Coronado GD; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
  • Nyongesa DB; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
  • Escaron AL; AltaMed Health Services, Corporation, Los Angeles, California.
  • Petrik AF; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
  • Thompson JH; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
  • Smith D; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
  • Davis MM; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Schneider JL; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
  • Rivelli JS; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
  • Laguna T; AltaMed Health Services, Corporation, Los Angeles, California.
  • Leo MC; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 32(11): 1608-1616, 2023 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37566431
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening rates, yet little is known about how to optimize these programs for effectiveness and cost.

METHODS:

PROMPT was a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of mailed FIT outreach. Participants in the standard condition were mailed a FIT and received live telephone reminders to return it. Participants in the enhanced condition also received a tailored advance notification (text message or live phone call) and two automated phone call reminders. The primary outcome was 6-month FIT completion; secondary outcomes were any colorectal cancer screening completion at 6 months, implementation, and program costs.

RESULTS:

The study included 27,585 participants (80% ages 50-64, 82% Hispanic/Latino; 68% preferred Spanish). A higher proportion of enhanced participants completed FIT at 6 months than standard participants, both in intention-to-treat [+2.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.4-5.2)] and per-protocol [limited to individuals who were reached; +16.9%, 95% CI (12.3-20.3)] analyses. Text messages and automated calls were successfully delivered to 91% to 100% of participants. The per-patient cost for standard mailed FIT was $10.84. The enhanced program's text message plus automated call reminder cost an additional $0.66; live phone calls plus an automated call reminder cost an additional $10.82 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS:

Adding advance notifications and automated calls to a standard mailed FIT program boosted 6-month FIT completion rates at a small additional per-patient cost. IMPACT Enhancements to mailed FIT outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening participation. Future research might test the addition of educational video messaging for screening-naïve adults.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article