Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line and Alternative Antibiotic Regimens in Hospitalized Patients With Nonsevere Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
Bai, Anthony D; Srivastava, Siddhartha; Wong, Benjamin K C; Digby, Geneviève C; Razak, Fahad; Verma, Amol A.
Afiliação
  • Bai AD; Divisions of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. Electronic address: tony.bai@queensu.ca.
  • Srivastava S; General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Wong BKC; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Digby GC; Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Razak F; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Verma AA; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Chest ; 165(1): 68-78, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37574164
BACKGROUND: There are several antibiotic regimens to treat community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). RESEARCH QUESTION: In patients hospitalized to a non-ICU ward setting with CAP, is there a difference between first-line and alternative antibiotic regimens (ß-lactam plus macrolide [BL+M], ß-lactam [BL] alone, respiratory fluoroquinolone [FQ], or ß-lactam plus doxycycline [BL+D]) in terms of in-hospital mortality? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients admitted with CAP at 19 Canadian hospitals from 2015 to 2021. Taking a target trial approach, patients were categorized into the four antibiotic groups based on the initial antibiotic treatment within 48 h of admission. Patients with severe CAP requiring ICU admission in the first 48 h were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome included time to being discharged alive. Propensity score and overlap weighting were used to balance covariates. RESULTS: Of 23,512 patients, 9,340 patients (39.7%) received BL+M, 9,146 (38.9%) received BL, 4,510 (19.2%) received FQ, and 516 (2.2%) received BL+D. The number of in-hospital deaths was 703 (7.5%) for the BL+M group, 888 (9.7%) for the BL group, 302 (6.7%) for the FQ group, and 31 (6.0%) for the BL+D group. The adjusted risk difference for in-hospital mortality when compared with BL+M was 1.5% (95% CI, -0.3% to 3.3%) for BL, -0.9% (95% CI, -2.9% to 1.1%) for FQ, and -1.9% (95% CI, -4.8% to 0.9%) for BL+D. Compared with BL+M, the subdistribution hazard ratio for being discharged alive was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.96) for BL, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.99-1.16) for FQ, and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.93-1.17) for BL+D. INTERPRETATION: BL+M, FQ, and BL+D had similar outcomes and can be considered effective regimens for nonsevere CAP. Compared with BL+M, BL was associated with longer time to discharge and the CI for mortality cannot exclude a small but clinically important increase in risk.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia / Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia / Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article