Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decreased Utilization Rate of Grafts for Liver Transplantation After Implementation of Acuity Circle-based Allocation.
Bekki, Yuki; Myers, Bryan; Tomiyama, Koji; Imaoka, Yuki; Akabane, Miho; Kwong, Allison J; Melcher, Marc L; Sasaki, Kazunari.
Afiliação
  • Bekki Y; Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY.
  • Myers B; Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY.
  • Tomiyama K; Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Imaoka Y; Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Akabane M; Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Kwong AJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Melcher ML; Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Sasaki K; Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Transplantation ; 108(2): 498-505, 2024 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37585345
BACKGROUND: The allocation system for livers began using acuity circles (AC) in 2020. In this study, we sought to evaluate the impact of AC policy on the utilization rate for liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Using the US national registry data between 2018 and 2022, LTs were equally divided into 2 eras: pre-AC (before February 4, 2020) and post-AC (February 4, 2020, and after). Deceased potential liver donors were defined as deceased donors from whom at least 1 organ was procured. RESULTS: The annual number of deceased potential liver donors increased post-AC (from 10 423 to 12 259), approaching equal to that of new waitlist registrations for LT (n = 12 801). Although the discard risk index of liver grafts was comparable between the pre- and post-AC eras, liver utilization rates in donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors were lower post-AC ( P < 0.01; 79.8% versus 83.4% and 23.7% versus 26.0%, respectively). Recipient factors, ie, no recipient located, recipient determined unsuitable, or time constraints, were more likely to be reasons for nonutilization after implementation of the AC allocation system compared to the pre-AC era (20.0% versus 12.3% for DBD donors and 50.1% versus 40.8% for DCD donors). Among non-high-volume centers, centers with lower utilization of marginal DBD donors or DCD donors were more likely to decrease LT volume post-AC. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of deceased potential liver donors has increased, overall liver utilization among deceased donors has decreased in the post-AC era. To maximize the donor pool for LT, future efforts should target specific reasons for liver nonutilization.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Fígado Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Fígado Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article