Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure.
Barone Gibbs, Bethany; Muldoon, Matthew F; Conroy, Molly B; Paley, Joshua L; Shimbo, Daichi; Perera, Subashan.
Afiliação
  • Barone Gibbs B; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA.
  • Muldoon MF; Departments of Health and Human Development, School of Education University of Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Conroy MB; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Paley JL; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.
  • Shimbo D; Departments of Health and Human Development, School of Education University of Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Perera S; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York NY USA.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(17): e029999, 2023 09 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37589152
ABSTRACT
Background There are no recommendations for being seated versus nonseated during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). The authors examined how recent standing or moving versus sitting affect average daytime BP on ABPM. Methods and Results This analysis used baseline assessments from a clinical trial in desk workers with office systolic BP (SBP) 120 to 159 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) 80 to 99 mm Hg. ABPM was measured every 30 minutes with a SunTech Medical Oscar 2 monitor. Concurrent posture (standing or seated) and moving (steps) were measured via a thigh-worn accelerometer. Linear regression determined within-person BP variability explained (R2) by standing and steps before ABPM readings. Mean daytime BP and the prevalence of mean daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg from readings after sitting (seated) or after recent standing or moving (nonseated) were compared with all readings. Participants (n=266, 59% women; age, 45.2±11.6 years) provided 32.5±3.9 daytime BP readings. Time standing and steps before readings explained variability up to 17% for daytime SBP and 14% for daytime DBP. Using the 5-minute prior interval, seated SBP/DBP was lower (130.8/79.7 mm Hg, P<0.001) and nonseated SBP/DBP was higher (137.8/84.3 mm Hg, P<0.001) than mean daytime SBP/DBP from all readings (133.9/81.6 mm Hg). The prevalence of mean daytime SBP/DBP ≥135/85 mm Hg also differed 38.7% from seated readings, 70.3% from nonseated readings, and 52.6% from all readings (P<0.05). Conclusions Daytime BP was systematically higher after standing and moving compared with being seated. Individual variation in activity patterns could influence the diagnosis of high BP using daytime BP readings on ABPM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial / Postura Sentada Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial / Postura Sentada Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article