Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography to Measure the Prevalence of Myocardial Bridge in Heart Transplant Patients.
Medina, Frank; Estrada, Andy; Fernandez, Christopher; Balkhy, Husam; Kim, Gene; Shah, Atman; Nathan, Sandeep; Paul, Jonathan; Kalathiya, Rohan; Blair, John.
Afiliação
  • Medina F; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Estrada A; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Fernandez C; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Balkhy H; Section of Cardiology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Kim G; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Shah A; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Nathan S; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Paul J; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Kalathiya R; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Blair J; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: jblair2@bsd.uchicago.edu.
Am J Cardiol ; 205: 176-181, 2023 10 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37604064
Myocardial bridge (MB) detection rates vary across methods and most studies that have assessed MB include symptomatic patients. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a sensitive tool for MB detection and donor hearts may serve as a surrogate measure of asymptomatic patients. We used IVUS and coronary angiography to measure MB prevalence in heart transplant patients during routine follow-up invasive coronary assessments. This was a retrospective, single-center study of heart transplant patients who received follow-up coronary assessments at the University of Chicago Heart and Vascular Center between December 2014 and December 2021. A single experienced interventional cardiologist assessed incidental findings of MB in IVUS and coronary angiography. Detection rates were compared with meta-analysis-reported prevalence. Of 129 patients, IVUS-detected MB in 87 patients (67.4%), whereas coronary angiography detected 41 (31.8%). All MB found by coronary angiography were detected by IVUS. Some level of cardiac allograft vasculopathy was found in 92 patients (71.3%). Our IVUS-detected MB prevalence was greater than meta-analysis-reported pooled prevalence across all methods: autopsy, computed tomography angiography, and coronary angiography (67.4% [95% confidence interval [CI] 59.4 to 75.5] vs 42% [95% CI 30 to 55]; 22% [95% CI 18 to 25]; 6% [95% CI 5 to 8], p ≤0.005). The difference between our observed IVUS-detected MB prevalence and meta-analysis autopsy reported MB prevalence was 1.25 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.40). In conclusion, the high prevalence of MB recorded in donor hearts emphasizes the need to further investigate the causes of chest pain in patients who are found to have MB.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article