Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance and patients' satisfaction with the A7+TouchCare insulin patch pump system: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study.
Amadou, Coralie; Melki, Vincent; Allain, Jennifer; Clavel, Sylvaine; Gouet, Didier; Chaillous, Lucy; Catargi, Bogdan; Schaeplynck-Belicard, Pauline; Petit, Catherine; Thivolet, Charles; Penfornis, Alfred.
Afiliação
  • Amadou C; Service d'Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien de Corbeil-Essonnes, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
  • Melki V; Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
  • Allain J; Service de Diabétologie-Maladies Métaboliques-Nutrition, CHU Hôpital Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
  • Clavel S; Service d'Endocrinologie-Diabétologie, Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Gonesse, France.
  • Gouet D; Hôpital du Creusot, Le Creusot, France.
  • Chaillous L; Hôpitaux La Rochelle, Ré, Aunis, La Rochelle, France.
  • Catargi B; Hôpital Nord Laennec, CHU Nantes, Saint-Herblain, France.
  • Schaeplynck-Belicard P; Hôpital Saint-André, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Petit C; Hôpital La conception, APHM, Marseille, France.
  • Thivolet C; Service d'Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien de Corbeil-Essonnes, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
  • Penfornis A; Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
PLoS One ; 18(8): e0289684, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616289
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We assessed the performance and patient satisfaction of a new insulin patch pump, the A7+TouchCare (Medtrum), compared with the Omnipod system.

METHODS:

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study enrolled 100 adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (A1C ≥ 6.5% and ≤ 9.5%, i.e., 48 to 80 mmol/mol) who were assigned with the Omnipod or with the A7+TouchCare pump for 3 months. The primary study outcome was the glucose management indicator (GMI) calculated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

RESULTS:

Premature withdrawals occurs respectively in 2 and 9 participants in the Omnipod and TouchCare groups. In the Per Protocol analysis, the difference in GMI between groups was 0.002% (95% confidence interval -0.251; 0.255). The non-inferiority was demonstrated since the difference between treatments did not overlap the pre-defined non-inferiority margin (0.4%). There was no significant difference in CGM parameters between groups. On average, patients in both groups were satisfied/very satisfied with the insulin pump system. Patients preferred Omnipod as an insulin management system and especially the patch delivery system but preferred the A7+TouchCare personal diabetes manager to control the system.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study showed that the A7+TouchCare insulin pump was as efficient as the Omnipod pump in terms of performance and satisfaction. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov protocol register (NCT04223973).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Insulinas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Insulinas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article