Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events.
Merrill, Tyler B; Patel, Vijay A; Pool, Christopher; Dornhoffer, John L; Saadi, Robert A.
Afiliação
  • Merrill TB; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Patel VA; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Pool C; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
  • Dornhoffer JL; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Saadi RA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 37(6): 686-691, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635415
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Eustachian tube balloon dilation (ETBD) has been Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for refractory Eustachian tube dysfunction since 2016. While ETBD is generally seen as safe, the complication profile has not been well defined.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to utilize the FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database to better assess adverse events (AE) related to ETBD.

METHODS:

This is a study of a multiinstitutional database maintained by the U.S. FDA. A database analysis was performed via the collaboration of multiple clinicians at tertiary referral centers. The FDA MAUDE database was queried for all medical device reports (MDR) related to ETBD devices from January 2012 to November 2022. Eighty-eight unique MDR were identified, 16 of which met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS:

Three MDRs were classified as device-related (18.8%); none resulted in an AE. Thirteen MDRs (81.3%) were patient-related; all were classified as AEs. The most common AE was postoperative subcutaneous emphysema (n = 6, 46.2%). Of the patients with subcutaneous emphysema, there was a wide range of severity. The most severe AE (n = 1, 6.3%) was postoperative stroke secondary to carotid artery dissection.

CONCLUSION:

Though ETBD is generally seen as a safe procedure, there have been several concerning AEs reported to date. Increased awareness of ETBD complications can serve as a primer for improved patient education and counseling during the informed consent process and aid surgeons in clinical decision-making. Future studies with standardized reporting protocols are warranted to create a central registry for ETBD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuba Auditiva Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuba Auditiva Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article