Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Kim, William T; Woodruff, Robert; Kalore, Niraj V; Vallem, Madan M; Cyrus, John W; Krumme, John W; Patel, Nirav K; Golladay, Gregory J.
Afiliação
  • Kim WT; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
  • Woodruff R; Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Buies Creek, North Carolina.
  • Kalore NV; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Vallem MM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Cyrus JW; Health Sciences Library, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Krumme JW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Patel NK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Golladay GJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(3): 846-850.e2, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648098
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Most primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in the United States utilize cementless fixation with porous or hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. A previous meta-analysis comparing HA-coated versus non-HA-coated stems in primary THA published in 2013 found no significant difference between the 2. However, an updated analysis of the current literature is needed to assess the potential benefit of HA-coated stems in primary THA.

METHODS:

Various libraries were searched through May 2022 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies included were randomized controlled trials comparing HA-coated femoral stems to non-HA-coated stems in primary THA. Outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), endosteal bone formation, radiolucent lines, linear wear rate, revision for aseptic loosening, thigh pain, and heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS:

There were significantly fewer revisions for aseptic loosening (P = .004) and decreased postoperative thigh pain (P = .03) for patients who have with HA-coated stems. There was no significant difference in HHS (P = .20), endosteal bone formation (P = .96), radiolucent lines (P = .75), linear wear rate (P = .41), or heterotopic ossification (P = .71) between HA-coated and non-HA-coated stems.

CONCLUSION:

We found that HA-coated femoral stems in primary THA led to significantly fewer stem revisions for aseptic loosening and less postoperative thigh pain compared to non-HA-coated stems. These findings suggest HA-coated femoral stems should be preferred over non-HA-coated femoral stems in primary THA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossificação Heterotópica / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossificação Heterotópica / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article