Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy for Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Cancers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Budrukkar, Ashwini; Murthy, Vedang; Kashid, Sheetal; Swain, Monali; Rangarajan, Venkatesh; Laskar, Sarbani Ghosh; Kannan, Sadhana; Kale, Shrikant; Upreti, Rituraj; Pai, Prathamesh; Pantvaidya, Gouri; Gupta, Tejpal; Agarwal, Jai Prakash.
Afiliação
  • Budrukkar A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: ashwini.budrukkar@gmail.com.
  • Murthy V; Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer/Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Kashid S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Swain M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Rangarajan V; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Laskar SG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Kannan S; Clinical Research Secretariat, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer/Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Kale S; Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Upreti R; Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Pai P; Department of Head Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Pantvaidya G; Department of Head Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Gupta T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer/Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Agarwal JP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 118(5): 1541-1551, 2024 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37660737
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone versus IMRT + brachytherapy (BT) in patients with T1-T2N0M0 oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Patients with stage I and II OPSCC were considered for IMRT to a dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks in phase I followed by randomization (11) to further treatment with IMRT (20 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks) or BT (192Ir high dose rate, 21 Gy/7 fractions/2 fractions per day). The primary endpoint of the trial was the reduction in xerostomia at 6 months evaluated using 99mTc salivary scintigraphy. Severe salivary toxicity (xerostomia) was defined as posttreatment salivary excretion fraction ratio <45%. Secondary endpoints were local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS:

Between November 2010 and February 2020, 90 patients were randomized to IMRT (n = 46) alone or IMRT + BT (n = 44). Eleven patients (8 residual/recurrent disease, 2 lost to follow-up, 1 second primary) in the IMRT arm and 9 patients (8 residual/recurrence, 1 lost to follow-up) in the BT arm were not evaluable at 6 months for the primary endpoint. At 6 months, xerostomia rates using salivary scintigraphy were 14% (5/35 95% CI, 5%-30%) in the BT arm while it was seen in 44% (14/32 95% CI, 26%-62%) in the IMRT arm (P = .008). Physician-rated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 xerostomia at any time point was observed in 30% of patients (9/30) in the IMRT arm and 6.7% (2/30) in the BT arm (P = .02). At a median follow-up of 42.5 months, the 3-year local control in the IMRT arm was 56.4% (95% CI, 43%-73%) while it was 66.2% (95% CI, 53%-82%) in the BT arm (P = .24).

CONCLUSIONS:

The addition of BT to IMRT for T1-T2N0M0 OPSCC results in a significant reduction in xerostomia. This strongly supports the addition of BT to IMRT in suitable cases.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Xerostomia / Braquiterapia / Neoplasias Orofaríngeas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Xerostomia / Braquiterapia / Neoplasias Orofaríngeas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article