Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence and risk of stillbirth according to biologic vulnerability phenotypes in the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil: A population-based cohort study.
Marques, Lays Janaina Prazeres; Silva, Zilda Pereira da; Alencar, Gizelton Pereira; Paixão, Enny Santos da; Blencowe, Hannah; de Almeida, Marcia Furquim.
Afiliação
  • Marques LJP; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Silva ZPD; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Alencar GP; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Paixão ESD; Center for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Blencowe H; Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • de Almeida MF; Maternal Adolescent Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 165(2): 442-452, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37712560
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate the prevalence and risk of stillbirths by biologic vulnerability phenotypes in a cohort of pregnant women in the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil, 2017-2019.

METHODS:

Retrospective population-based cohort study. Fetuses were assessed as small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), adequate for gestational age (AGA), preterm (PT) as less than 37 weeks of gestation, non-PT (NPT) as 37 weeks of gestation or more, low birth weight (LBW) as less than 2500 g, and non-LBW (NLBW) as 2500 g or more. Relative risks (RR) with robust variance were estimated using Poisson regression.

RESULTS:

In all 442 782 pregnancies, including 2321 (0.5%) stillbirths, were included. About 85% (n = 1983) of stillbirths had at least one characteristic of vulnerability, compared with 21% (n = 92524) of live births. Fetuses with all three markers of vulnerability had the highest adjusted RR of stillbirth-SGA + LBW + PT (RR 155.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 136.29-176.30) and LGA + LBW + PT (RR 262.04; 95% CI 206.10-333.16) when compared with AGA + NLBW + NPT.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings show that the simultaneous presence of prematurity, low birth weight, and abnormal intrauterine growth presented a higher risk of stillbirths. To accelerate progress towards reducing preventable stillbirths, one must identify the circumstances of greatest biologic vulnerability.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Natimorto Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Natimorto Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article