Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitization Assessment of Extractables and Leachables in Pharmaceuticals: ELSIE Database Analysis.
Parris, Patricia; Whelan, Geraldine; Burild, Anders; Whritenour, Jessica; Bruen, Uma; Bercu, Joel; Callis, Courtney; Chilton, Martyn L; Graham, Jessica; Johann, Esther; Johnson, Candice; Griffin, Troy; Kohan, Martin; Martin, Elizabeth A; Masuda-Herrera, Melisa; Stanard, Brad; Cruz, Maureen T; Nagao, Lee.
Afiliação
  • Parris P; Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Sandwich, UK; patricia.parris@pfizer.com.
  • Whelan G; GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, UK.
  • Burild A; Novo Nordisk A/S, Safety Sciences and Imaging, Malov, Denmark.
  • Whritenour J; Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Groton, CT, USA.
  • Bruen U; Organon USA Inc., Jersey City, NJ, USA.
  • Bercu J; Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Callis C; Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Chilton ML; Lhasa Limited, Granary Wharf House, 2 Canal Wharf, Leeds, LS11 5PS, UK.
  • Graham J; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Johann E; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Johnson C; Instem, 1393 Dublin Road, Columbus, Ohio USA.
  • Griffin T; Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, West Chester, PA, USA.
  • Kohan M; formerly of Global Sustainability, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Martin EA; Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Masuda-Herrera M; Gilead Sciences.
  • Stanard B; Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA, USA.
  • Cruz MT; Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.
  • Nagao L; Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37714567
ABSTRACT
Quality by design is the foundation of the risk management framework for extractables and leachables (E&Ls) recommended by the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE). Following these principles during the selection of materials for pharmaceutical product development minimizes the presence of highly toxic substances and decreases the health risk of potential leachables in the drug product. Therefore, in the context of the broad arena of chemicals, it is important to distinguish E&Ls as a subset of chemicals and evaluate this relevant chemical space to derive appropriate analytical and safety thresholds. When considering the health hazards posed by E&Ls, one area presenting a challenge is understanding the sensitization potential and whether it poses a risk to patients. A dataset of E&Ls compiled by ELSIE (n=466) was analysed to determine the prevalence and potency of skin sensitizers in this chemical subset and explore a scientifically justified approach to the sensitization assessment of potential leachables in parenteral drug products. Approximately half of the compounds (56%, 259/466) had sensitization data recorded in the ELSIE database and of these, 20% (52/259) are potential skin sensitizers. Only 3% (8/259) of the E&L dataset with sensitization data were considered potent (strong or extreme) sensitizers following in silico analysis and expert review, illustrating that potent sensitizers are not routinely observed as leachables in pharmaceutical products. Our analysis highlights that in silico potency prediction and expert review are key tools during the sensitization assessment process for E&Ls. The results confirm where material selection is anticipated to mitigate the risk of presence of strong and/or extreme sensitizers (e.g., extractable testing via ISO 10993-10), and that implementing thresholds per ICH M7 and/or Masuda-Herrera et al. provides a reasonably conservative approach for establishing the analytical testing and safety thresholds.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article