Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of synthetically generated computed tomography for use in transcranial focused ultrasound procedures.
Liu, Han; Sigona, Michelle K; Manuel, Thomas J; Chen, Li Min; Dawant, Benoit M; Caskey, Charles F.
Afiliação
  • Liu H; Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Sigona MK; Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Manuel TJ; Vanderbilt University, Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Chen LM; Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Dawant BM; Vanderbilt University, Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Caskey CF; Vanderbilt University, Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 10(5): 055001, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37744953
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a therapeutic ultrasound method that focuses sound through the skull to a small region noninvasively and often under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance. CT imaging is used to estimate the acoustic properties that vary between individual skulls to enable effective focusing during tFUS procedures, exposing patients to potentially harmful radiation. A method to estimate acoustic parameters in the skull without the need for CT is desirable.

Approach:

We synthesized CT images from routinely acquired T1-weighted MRI using a 3D patch-based conditional generative adversarial network and evaluated the performance of synthesized CT (sCT) images for treatment planning with tFUS. We compared the performance of sCT with real CT (rCT) images for tFUS planning using Kranion and simulations using the acoustic toolbox, k-Wave. Simulations were performed for 3 tFUS scenarios (1) no aberration correction, (2) correction with phases calculated from Kranion, and (3) phase shifts calculated from time reversal.

Results:

From Kranion, the skull density ratio, skull thickness, and number of active elements between rCT and sCT had Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.94, 0.92, and 0.98, respectively. Among 20 targets, differences in simulated peak pressure between rCT and sCT were largest without phase correction (12.4%±8.1%) and smallest with Kranion phases (7.3%±6.0%). The distance between peak focal locations between rCT and sCT was <1.3 mm for all simulation cases.

Conclusions:

Real and synthetically generated skulls had comparable image similarity, skull measurements, and acoustic simulation metrics. Our work demonstrated similar results for 10 testing cases comparing MR-sCTs and rCTs for tFUS planning. Source code and a docker image with the trained model are available at https//github.com/han-liu/SynCT_TcMRgFUS.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article