Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgery's Rosetta Stone: Natural language processing to predict discharge and readmission after general surgery.
Kovoor, Joshua G; Bacchi, Stephen; Gupta, Aashray K; Stretton, Brandon; Nann, Silas D; Aujayeb, Nidhi; Lu, Amy; Nathin, Kayla; Lam, Lydia; Jiang, Melinda; Lee, Shane; To, Minh-Son; Ovenden, Christopher D; Hewitt, Joseph N; Goh, Rudy; Gluck, Samuel; Reid, Jessica L; Khurana, Sanjeev; Dobbins, Christopher; Hewett, Peter J; Padbury, Robert T; Malycha, James; Trochsler, Markus I; Hugh, Thomas J; Maddern, Guy J.
Afiliação
  • Kovoor JG; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/j
  • Bacchi S; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Gupta AK; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, A
  • Stretton B; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Austr
  • Nann SD; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Aujayeb N; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Lu A; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Nathin K; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Lam L; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Jiang M; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Lee S; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • To MS; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Ovenden CD; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Hewitt JN; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Goh R; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Gluck S; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Reid JL; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Khurana S; Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Dobbins C; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Hewett PJ; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Padbury RT; Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Malycha J; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Trochsler MI; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Hugh TJ; University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Maddern GJ; Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: guy.maddern@adelaide.edu.au.
Surgery ; 174(6): 1309-1314, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778968
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to examine the accuracy with which multiple natural language processing artificial intelligence models could predict discharge and readmissions after general surgery.

METHODS:

Natural language processing models were derived and validated to predict discharge within the next 48 hours and 7 days and readmission within 30 days (based on daily ward round notes and discharge summaries, respectively) for general surgery inpatients at 2 South Australian hospitals. Natural language processing models included logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers.

RESULTS:

For discharge prediction analyses, 14,690 admissions were included. For readmission prediction analyses, 12,457 patients were included. For prediction of discharge within 48 hours, derivation and validation data set area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were, respectively 0.86 and 0.86 for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, 0.82 and 0.81 for logistic regression, and 0.82 and 0.81 for artificial neural networks. For prediction of discharge within 7 days, derivation and validation data set area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were, respectively 0.82 and 0.81 for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, 0.75 and 0.72 for logistic regression, and 0.68 and 0.67 for artificial neural networks. For readmission prediction within 30 days, derivation and validation data set area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were, respectively 0.55 and 0.59 for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers and 0.77 and 0.62 for logistic regression.

CONCLUSION:

Modern natural language processing models, particularly Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, can effectively and accurately identify general surgery patients who will be discharged in the next 48 hours. However, these approaches are less capable of identifying general surgery patients who will be discharged within the next 7 days or who will experience readmission within 30 days of discharge.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Inteligência Artificial Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Inteligência Artificial Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article