The Comparison of Two Whole-Genome Amplification Approaches for Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (ni-PGT) and the Application Scenario of ni-PGT during the Fresh Cycle.

ABSTRACT

Recently, noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing (ni-PGT) using degenerate oligonucleotide primer PCR (DOP-PCR) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle (MALBAC)-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) methods has demonstrated predictable results in embryo testing. However, a considerable heterogeneity of results has been reported in numerous studies on these two WGA methods. Our aim was to evaluate the current WGA method for ni-PGT while further clarifying the applicable scenarios of ni-PGT in the fresh cycle. A total of 173 embryos were tested with trophectoderm biopsy and ni-PGT. In the whole preimplantation genetic testing, the clinical concordance rates of the detection results of DOP-PCR and MALBAC with the corresponding trophectoderm biopsy results were 64.12% (84/131) and 68.99% (89/129), respectively (P = 0.405). However, in the detection of abnormal embryos, the detection efficiency of ni-PGT is significantly improved [MALBAC 96.55% versus 68.99% (P < 0.001); and DOP-PCR 89.09% versus 64.12% (P < 0.001)]. In addition, the diagnostic efficiency of ni-PGT in low-quality blastocysts was significantly higher than that in high-quality blastocysts [MALBAC 95.24% versus 51.85% (P = 0.001); and DOP-PCR 91.30% versus 48.15% (P = 0.001)]. These results contribute to further understanding ni-PGT and to clarifying its application scenario in the fresh cycle.