Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect and safety profile of topical lidocaine on post-surgical neuropathic pain and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mao, Peng; Zhang, Yi; Liu, Botao; Li, Yifan; Chang, Yaping; Zhu, Meng; Zhang, Yuan; Fan, Bifa.
Afiliação
  • Mao P; Department of Pain Management, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Pain Management, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Liu B; Department of Pain Management, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Pain Management, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Chang Y; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Zhu M; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Fan B; Department of Pain Management, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: fanbifa@outlook.com.
J Clin Anesth ; 92: 111219, 2024 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37827033
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

Post-surgical chronic pain with a neuropathic component is usually more severe and leads to worse quality of life. We conducted this systematic review to examine the evidence of topical lidocaine for post-surgical neuropathic pain.

DESIGN:

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

SETTING:

Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical lidocaine with placebo or no topical lidocaine for post-surgical neuropathic pain. PATIENTS Seven RCTs including 585 patients.

INTERVENTIONS:

We systematically searched databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect and safety outcomes of topical lidocaine compared with placebo or no intervention. MEASUREMENTS We conducted meta-analyses to evaluate the effect of topical lidocaine on pain intensity, adverse events, and quality of life. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were effect measures for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. We assessed the risk of bias of included trials and the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN

RESULTS:

Our review included 7 studies with 585 participants. There is moderate certainty evidence that topical lidocaine may increase the likelihood of global pain relief, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 3.76; I2 = 70%, P = 0.04). Low certainty evidence suggested topical lidocaine may lead to more reduction in pain intensity (SMD -0.70; 95% confidence interval -1.46, 0.06; I2 = 93%, P = 0.07). High certainty evidence showed that topical lidocaine did not increase the adverse event risk (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.93, 1.16; I2 = 0%, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS:

Topical lidocaine may lead to pain relief and is safe to use for patient with post-surgical pain, though its impact on quality of life is unclear. This review supports the use of topical lidocaine for patients with post-surgical pain, and reveals the evidence gap in topical lidocaine use. (Registration PROSPERO CRD42021294100).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lidocaína / Neuralgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lidocaína / Neuralgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article