Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological safety and accountability in longitudinal integrated clerkships: a dual institution qualitative study.
Latessa, Robyn A; Galvin, Shelley L; Swendiman, Robert A; Onyango, Joshua; Ostrach, Bayla; Edmondson, Amy C; Davis, Scott A; Hirsh, David A.
Afiliação
  • Latessa RA; Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Galvin SL; University of North Carolina Health Sciences at Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC, USA.
  • Swendiman RA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC, USA.
  • Onyango J; Department of Pediatric General Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Ostrach B; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Edmondson AC; University of North Carolina Health Sciences at Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC, USA.
  • Davis SA; Departments of Family Medicine and Medical Anthropology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Hirsh DA; Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 760, 2023 Oct 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828469
BACKGROUND: Psychological safety and accountability are frameworks to describe relationships in the workplace. Psychological safety is a shared belief by members of a team that it is safe to take interpersonal risks. Accountability refers to being challenged and expected to meet expectations and goals. Psychological safety and accountability are supported by relational trust. Relational continuity is the educational construct underpinning longitudinal integrated clerkships. The workplace constructs of psychological safety and accountability may offer lenses to understand students' educational experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study of 9 years of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates from two regionally diverse programs-at Harvard Medical School and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. We used deductive content analysis to characterize psychological safety and accountability from semi-structured interviews of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates. RESULTS: Analysis of 20 graduates' interview transcripts reached saturation. We identified 109 discrete excerpts describing psychological safety, accountability, or both. Excerpts with high psychological safety described trusting relationships and safe learning spaces. Low psychological safety included fear and frustration and perceptions of stressful learning environments. Excerpts characterizing high accountability involved increased learning and responsibility toward patients. Low accountability included students not feeling challenged. Graduates' descriptions with both high psychological safety and high accountability characterized optimized learning and performance. CONCLUSIONS: This study used the workplace-based frameworks of psychological safety and accountability to explore qualitatively longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates' experiences as students. Graduates described high and low psychological safety and accountability. Graduates' descriptions of high psychological safety and accountability involved positive learning experiences and responsibility toward patients. The relational lenses of psychological safety and accountability may inform faculty development and future educational research in clinical medical education.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Estágio Clínico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Estágio Clínico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article