Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Accuracy of Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Map Parameters to Detect Keratoconus and Suspect Keratoconus.
Salman, Abdelrahman; Mazzotta, Cosimo; Kailani, Obeda; Ghabra, Marwan; Omran, Rana; Balamoun, Ashraf Armia; Darwish, Taym; Shaaban, Rafea; Alhaji, Hala.
Afiliação
  • Salman A; Department of Ophthalmology, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria.
  • Mazzotta C; Departmental Ophthalmology Unit, AUSL Toscana Sudest, Siena, Italy.
  • Kailani O; Ophthalmology School, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Ghabra M; Siena International Crosslinking Centre, Siena, Italy.
  • Omran R; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Balamoun AA; Whipps Cross University Hospital, Leytonstone, London, UK.
  • Darwish T; Eye Surgical Hospital, Damascus, Syria.
  • Shaaban R; Watany Eye Hospital (WEH), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Alhaji H; Watany Research and Development Centre, Cario, Egypt.
J Ophthalmol ; 2023: 6677932, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37842327
ABSTRACT

Aim:

To establish the diagnostic accuracy of corneal and epithelial thickness measurements obtained by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in detecting keratoconus (KC) and suspect keratoconus (SKC).

Methods:

This retrospective study reviewed the data of 144 eyes separated into three groups by the Sirius automated corneal classification software normal (N) (n = 65), SKC (n = 43), and KC (n = 36). Corneal thickness (CT) and epithelial thickness (ET) in the central (0-2 mm) and paracentral (2-5 mm) zones were obtained with the Cirrus high-definition OCT. Areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were compared across groups to estimate their discrimination capacity.

Results:

ROC curve analysis revealed excellent predictive ability for ET variables minimum (Min) ET (0_2), minimum-maximum (Min-Max) ET (0_2), superonasal-inferotemporal (SN-IT) ET (2_5), Min-Max ET (2_5), and Min ET (2_5) to detect keratoconus (AUC > 0.9, all). Min-Max CT (0_2) was the only CT parameter with excellent ability to discriminate between KC and N eyes (AUC = 0.94; cutoff = ≤-32 µm). However, both ET and CT variables were not strong enough (AUC < 0.8, all) to differentiate between SKC and N eyes, with the highest diagnostic power for Min-Max ET (2_5) (AUC = 0.71; cutoff = ≤-9 µm) and central corneal thickness (CCT) (AUC = 0.76; cutoff = ≤533 µm).

Conclusion:

These results demonstrate that OCT-derived CT and ET are able to differentiate between KC and N eyes, with a high level of certainty. However, Min-Max ET (2_5) was the parameter with the highest ability to detect suspect keratoconus.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article