Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How success is evaluated in collaborative invasive species management: A systematic review.
Abeysinghe, Nisansala; Guerrero, Angela M; Rhodes, Jonathan R; McDonald-Madden, Eve; O'Bryan, Christopher J.
Afiliação
  • Abeysinghe N; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Electronic address: n.abeysinghe@uq.edu.au.
  • Guerrero AM; School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
  • Rhodes JR; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • McDonald-Madden E; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • O'Bryan CJ; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
J Environ Manage ; 348: 119272, 2023 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37862887
Invasive species are one of the most pressing global challenges for biodiversity and agriculture. They can cause species extinctions, ecosystem alterations, crop damage, and spread harmful diseases across broad regions. Overcoming this challenge requires collaborative management efforts that span multiple land tenures and jurisdictions. Despite evidence on the importance and approaches to collaboration, there is little understanding of how success is evaluated in the invasive species management literature. This is a major gap, considering evaluating success is crucial for enhancing the efficacy of future management projects. To overcome this knowledge gap, we systematically reviewed the published literature to identify the stages at which success is evaluated - that is, the Process stage (collaborative management actions and Processes), Outputs stage (results of management actions to protect environmental, economic, and social values) and Outcomes stage (effects of Outputs on environmental, economic, and social values) of collaborative invasive species management projects. We also assessed what indicators were used to identify success and whether these evaluations vary across different characteristics of collaborative invasive species management. Our literature search detected 1406 papers, of which 58 met our selection criteria. Out of these, the majority of papers evaluated success across two stages (n = 25, 43.1%), whereas only ten (17.2%) papers evaluated success across all stages. Outputs were the most commonly evaluated stage (n = 40, 68.9%). The most widely used indicators of success for these stages included increased collaboration of stakeholders (Process stage), the number of captured/eradicated/controlled invasive species (Outputs stage) and change in biodiversity values, such as the number of threatened species (Outcomes stage). Most indicators of success were environmentally focused. We highlight the need to align the indicators of success and evaluation stages with the fundamental objectives of the projects to increase the effectiveness of evaluations and thereby maximise the benefits of collaborative invasive species management.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Espécies Introduzidas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Espécies Introduzidas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article