Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis.
Wang, Andrew; Karunungan, Krystal L; Story, Jacob D; Shlobin, Nathan A; Woo, Jiyun; Ha, Edward L; Hauer, Karen E; Braddock, Clarence H.
Afiliação
  • Wang A; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. andrewwang@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Karunungan KL; College of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA. andrewwang@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Story JD; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
  • Shlobin NA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
  • Woo J; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Ha EL; Crean Lutheran High School, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Hauer KE; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
  • Braddock CH; University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 788, 2023 Oct 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37875929
ABSTRACT
Pass/fail (P/F) grading has emerged as an alternative to tiered clerkship grading. Systematically evaluating existing literature and surveying program directors (PD) perspectives on these consequential changes can guide educators in addressing inequalities in academia and students aiming to improve their residency applications. In our survey, a total of 1578 unique PD responses (63.1%) were obtained across 29 medical specialties. With the changes to United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE), responses showed increased importance of core clerkships with the implementation of Step 2CK cutoffs. PDs believed core clerkship performance was a reliable representation of an applicant's preparedness for residency, particularly in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME)Medical Knowledge and Patient Care and Procedural Skills. PDs disagreed with P/F core clerkships because it more difficult to objectively compare applicants. No statistically significant differences in responses were found in PD preferential selection when comparing applicants from tiered and P/F core clerkship grading systems. If core clerkships adopted P/F scoring, PDs would further increase emphasis on narrative assessment, sub-internship evaluation, reference letters, academic awards, professional development and medical school prestige. In the meta-analysis, of 6 studies from 2,118 participants, adjusted scaled scores with mean difference from an equal variance model from PDs showed residents from tiered clerkship grading systems overall performance, learning ability, work habits, personal evaluations, residency selection and educational evaluation were not statistically significantly different than from residents from P/F systems. Overall, our dual study suggests that while PDs do not favor P/F core clerkships, PDs do not have a selection preference and do not report a difference in performance between applicants from P/F vs. tiered grading core clerkship systems, thus providing fertile grounds for institutions to examine the feasibility of adopting P/F grading for core clerkships.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Estágio Clínico / Internato e Residência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Estágio Clínico / Internato e Residência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article