Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is ultraviolet light disinfection fit to be the future standard for the disinfection of flexible endoscopes without a working channel?
Halmans, Yana; Wellenstein, David J; Romijn, Michael; Cremers, Suzan; Smit, Jannie J; Hopman, Joost; Takes, Robert P; van den Broek, Guido B.
Afiliação
  • Halmans Y; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Wellenstein DJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Romijn M; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Cremers S; Department of Hygiene and Infection Prevention, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Smit JJ; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Hopman J; Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Takes RP; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van den Broek GB; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University, Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 49(1): 130-135, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37882501
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction on contaminated flexible endoscopes (FEs) without a working channel after UV-C light disinfection, compared to the current disinfection method with the endoscope washer disinfector (EWD). DESIGN, SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS:

After pharyngolaryngoscopy, a manual pre-cleaning with tap water was performed. A culture was then collected by rolling the distal 8-10 cm of the FE over an Agar plate. The FE was disinfected using the D60 (60-s disinfection process with UV-C light) or the EWD (gold standard reprocessing process with water and chemicals). Another culture was then taken. After incubation, a CFU count was performed.

RESULTS:

A total of 200 FEs without a working channel were divided equally between the two disinfection groups. After clinical use and manual pre-cleaning, 84 of the 100 (84.0%) (UV-C light group) and 79 of the 100 (79.0%) (EWD) FEs were contaminated with at least 1 CFU. FEs that showed no contamination after use were excluded from further analysis. After disinfection with UV-C light, 72 (85.7%) FEs showed no contamination (i.e., 0 CFUs) versus 66 (83.5%) FEs after reprocessing with the EWD.

CONCLUSION:

There is no difference in CFUs reduction on contaminated FEs without a working channel between UV-C light disinfection and the current gold standard, the EWD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios Ultravioleta / Desinfecção Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios Ultravioleta / Desinfecção Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article