Tumor molecular landscape of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) related nasopharyngeal carcinoma in EBV-endemic and non-endemic areas: Implications for improving treatment modalities.

ABSTRACT

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) related- nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a squamous carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal mucosal lining. Endemic areas (EA) are east and Southeast Asia, were NPC was recorded with higher incidence and longer estimated survival than in non-endemic area (NEA) such as Europe, We analyzed the gene expression and microenvironment properties of NPC in both areas to identify molecular subtypes and assess biological and clinical correlates that might explain the differences in incidence and outcome between EA- and NEA-NPCs. Six EA-NPC transcriptomic datasets, including tumor and normal samples, were integrated in a meta-analysis to identify molecular subtypes using a ConsensusClusterPlus bioinformatic approach. Based on the biological/functional characterization of four identified clusters were identified Cl1, Immune-active; Cl2, defense-response; Cl3, proliferation; Cl4, perineural-interaction/EBV-exhaustion. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, applied to the single dataset with available disease-free survival indicated Cl3 as the cluster with the worst prognosis (P = 0.0476), confirmed when applying four previously published prognostic signatures. A Cl3 classifier signature was generated and its prognostic performance was confirmed (P = 0.0368) on a validation dataset. Prediction of treatment response suggested better responses to radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors immune-active and defense-response clusters; chemotherapy proliferation cluster; cisplatin perineural-interaction/EBV-exhaustion cluster. RNA sequencing for gene expression profiling was performed on 50 NEA-NPC Italian samples. In the NEA cohort, Cl1, Cl2 and Cl3 were represented, while perineural-interaction/EBV-exhaustion was almost absent. The immune/biological characterization and treatment-response prediction analyses of NEA-NPC partially replicated the EA-NPC results. Well characterized EA- and NEA-NPC retrospective and prospective cohorts are needed to validate the obtained results and can help designing future clinical studies.