Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anaesthetic mortality in dogs: A worldwide analysis and risk assessment.
Redondo, José I; Otero, Pablo E; Martínez-Taboada, Fernando; Doménech, Luis; Hernández-Magaña, Eva Zoe; Viscasillas, Jaime.
Afiliação
  • Redondo JI; Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera - CEU, Valencia, Spain.
  • Otero PE; Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Martínez-Taboada F; Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Doménech L; 3A Animal Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hernández-Magaña EZ; Departamento de Matemáticas, Física y Ciencias Tecnológicas, Escuela Superior de Enseñanzas Técnicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera - CEU, Valencia, Spain.
  • Viscasillas J; Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera - CEU, Valencia, Spain.
Vet Rec ; : e3604, 2023 Nov 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37953683
BACKGROUND: Ensuring patient safety during small animal anaesthesia is crucial. This study aimed to assess anaesthetic-related deaths in dogs globally, identify risks and protective factors and inform clinical practice. METHODS: This prospective cohort multicentric study involved 55,022 dogs from 405 veterinary centres across various countries. Data on anaesthesia-related deaths from premedication to 48 hours post-extubation were collected. Logistic regression was used to analyse patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, procedure type and anaesthetic drugs used. RESULTS: Anaesthetic-related mortality was 0.69%. Most deaths occurred postoperatively (81%). Age, obesity and a higher ASA classification score were associated with increased mortality. Urgent procedures, non-urgent but unscheduled anaesthesias and short procedures also had higher mortality. Some sedatives, systemic analgesics, hypnotics and the use of locoregional anaesthesia were linked to a decrease in mortality. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of the study include the non-randomised sample, potential selection bias, lack of response rate quantification, variable data quality control, subjectivity in classifying causes of death and limited analysis of variables. CONCLUSION: Careful patient evaluation, drug selection and monitoring can be associated with reduced mortality. These findings can be used to develop guidelines and strategies to improve patient safety and outcomes. Further research is needed to refine protocols, enhance data quality systems and explore additional risk mitigation measures.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article