Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools.
Golla, Kathrin; Benesic, Andreas; Mannell, Hanna; Dreischulte, Tobias; Grill, Eva; Strobach, Dorothea.
Afiliação
  • Golla K; Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Benesic A; Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Mannell H; Department of Internal Medicine-Gastroenterology, Krankenhaus GmbH Weilheim-Schongau, Marie-Eberth Str. 6, 86956 Schongau, Germany.
  • Dreischulte T; Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Grill E; Department of Physiology, Institute for Theoretical Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.
  • Strobach D; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336 Munich, Germany.
J Clin Med ; 12(21)2023 Oct 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37959279
Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four liver scores as potential screening instruments. We retrospectively recorded liver/bile diagnoses, symptoms and abnormalities (summarized as hepatic findings) of 200 surgical patients followed by an assessment of the relevance of these findings for drug therapy (rating). The agreement between the Model of Endstage Liver Disease (MELD), Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), Fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the rating was quantified by Cohen's Kappa. The performance of the scores in this setting was further evaluated by their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Of 200 patients, 18 (9%) had hepatic findings relevant for drug therapy. Fair agreement was found for FIB-4 and MELD and slight agreement for APRI and NFS compared to the rating. The highest values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 41.2% (MELD), 99.3% (APRI), 66.7% (APRI), and 93.6% (MELD), respectively. Due to low performance, none of the scores can be recommended for clinical use as a single screening tool for HI at hospital admission.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article