Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Twenty years on from the introduction of the high risk strategy for stroke and cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic scoping review.
Feigin, Valery L; Martins, Sheila C; Brainin, Michael; Norrving, Bo; Kamenova, Saltanat; Giniyat, Azhar; Kondybayeva, Aida; Aldyngurov, Daulet K; Bapayeva, Magripa; Zhanuzakov, Murat; Hankey, Graeme J.
Afiliação
  • Feigin VL; National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Martins SC; Institute for Health Metrics Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Brainin M; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Norrving B; Department of Neuroscience and Preventive Medicine, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria.
  • Kamenova S; Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Giniyat A; Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Kondybayeva A; Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
  • Aldyngurov DK; Minister of Healthcare of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
  • Bapayeva M; Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
  • Zhanuzakov M; Department of Science and Human Resource, Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
  • Hankey GJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Kazakhstan Medical University «KSPH¼, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(3): e16157, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38009814
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Early this century, the high risk strategy of primary stroke and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention for individuals shifted away from identifying (and treating, as appropriate) all at-risk individuals towards identifying and treating individuals who exceed arbitrary thresholds of absolute CVD risk. The public health impact of this strategy is uncertain.

METHODS:

In our systematic scoping review, the electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library) were searched to identify and appraise publications related to primary CVD/stroke prevention strategies and their effectiveness published in any language from January 1990 to August 2023.

RESULTS:

No published randomized controlled trial was found on the effectiveness of the high CVD risk strategy for primary stroke/CVD prevention. Targeting high CVD risk individuals excludes a large proportion of the population from effective blood-pressure-lowering and lipid-lowering treatment and effective CVD prevention. There is also evidence that blood pressure lowering and lipid lowering are beneficial irrespective of blood pressure and cholesterol levels and irrespective of absolute CVD risk and that risk-stratified pharmacological management of blood pressure and lipids to only high CVD risk individuals leads to significant underuse of blood-pressure-lowering and lipid-lowering medications in individuals otherwise eligible for such treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Primary stroke and CVD prevention needs to be done in all individuals with increased risk of CVD/stroke. Pharmacological management of blood pressure and blood cholesterol should not be solely based on the high CVD risk treatment thresholds. International guidelines and global strategies for primary CVD/stroke prevention need to be revised.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Infarto do Miocárdio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Infarto do Miocárdio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article