Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative study of exoelectrogenic utilization preferences and hydrogen conversion among major fermentation products in microbial electrolysis cells.
Choi, Yunjeong; Kim, Danbee; Choi, Hyungmin; Cha, Junho; Baek, Gahyun; Lee, Changsoo.
Afiliação
  • Choi Y; Department of Civil, Urban, Earth, and Environmental Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim D; Department of Civil, Urban, Earth, and Environmental Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea; Gwangju Clean Energy R&D Center, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Gwangju 61003, Republic of Korea.
  • Choi H; Department of Civil, Urban, Earth, and Environmental Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.
  • Cha J; Department of Civil, Urban, Earth, and Environmental Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.
  • Baek G; Department of Integrative Biotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: gbaek@skku.edu.
  • Lee C; Department of Civil, Urban, Earth, and Environmental Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea; Graduate School of Carbon Neutrality, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: cslee@unist.ac.kr.
Bioresour Technol ; 393: 130032, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013038
ABSTRACT
This study comparatively investigated the exoelectrogenic utilization and hydrogen conversion of major dark fermentation products (acetate, propionate, butyrate, lactate, and ethanol) from organic wastes in dual-chamber microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) alongside their mixture as a simulated dark fermentation effluent (DFE). Acetate-fed MECs showed the highest hydrogen yield (1,465 mL/g chemical oxygen demand), near the theoretical maximum yield, with the highest coulombic efficiency (105%) and maximum current density (7.9 A/m2), followed by lactate-fed, propionate-fed, butyrate-fed, mixture-fed, and ethanol-fed MECs. Meanwhile, the highest hydrogen production rate (514 mL/L anolyte∙d) was observed in ethanol-fed MECs despite their lower coulombic efficiency. Butyrate was the least favored substrate, followed by propionate, leading to significantly delayed startup and reaction. The active anodic microbial community structure varied considerably among the MECs utilizing different substrates, particularly between Geobacter and Acetobacterium dominance. The results highlight the substantial effect of the DFE composition on its utilization and current-producing bioanode development.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propionatos / Fontes de Energia Bioelétrica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propionatos / Fontes de Energia Bioelétrica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article