Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attributions and perpetrators of incivility in academic surgery.
Santosa, Katherine B; Hayward, Laura; Matusko, Niki; Kubiak, Carrie A; Strong, Amy L; Waljee, Jennifer F; Jagsi, Reshma; Sandhu, Gurjit.
Afiliação
  • Santosa KB; The Center for Plastic Surgery, MetroDerm, P.C., Atlanta, GA USA.
  • Hayward L; Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
  • Matusko N; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
  • Kubiak CA; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
  • Strong AL; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
  • Waljee JF; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
  • Jagsi R; Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA.
  • Sandhu G; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr 2207 Taubman Center SPC 5346, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5346 USA.
Global Surg Educ ; 2(1): 56, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013864
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Although incivility has been described in other specialties, little is known about the attributes and perpetrators of it in academic surgery. The goal of this study was to identify attributes and commonly associated perpetrators of incivility experienced by trainees and faculty at academic surgery programs in the U.S.

Methods:

A web-based survey including the Workplace Incivility Scale (WIS) and questions regarding attributions and perpetrators of incivility was sent to trainees and faculty at academic institutions across the U.S. In addition to descriptive statistics, multivariable regression models were built to determine the impact of perpetrator type and number on overall incivility scores.

Results:

We received 367 of 2,661 (13.8%) responses. Top three reasons for incivility were surgery hierarchy (50.1%), respondent's gender (33.8%) and intergenerational differences (28.1%). Faculty (58.6%), patients (36.8%), and nursing staff (31.9%) were the most reported parties responsible for incivility. Female surgeons reported experiencing incivility more frequently from all three top responsible parties (i.e., faculty, patients, and nurses) when compared to other gender identities. Additionally, those who reported faculty (ß = 0.61, 95%CI 0.39-0.82) or nurses (ß = 0.23, 95%CI 0.009-0.45) as perpetrators of incivility reported an increase in overall incivility scores.

Conclusions:

Incivility in surgery is frequently attributed to surgery hierarchy, gender, and intergenerational differences. Surgical trainees and faculty reported that faculty, patients, and nurses were the most commonly identified as responsible for uncivil events in the surgical workforce. Exposure to a greater variety of perpetrators of incivility increases overall levels of incivility, emphasizing the importance of eliminating incivility from all sources. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-023-00129-1.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article