Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system.
Naude, Kim; Andrew, Nadine E; Srikanth, Velandai; Parker, Emily; Marsh, Lucy; Beare, Richard; McNaney, Roisin; Snowdon, David A.
Afiliação
  • Naude K; National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia. kim.naude@monash.edu.
  • Andrew NE; Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia. kim.naude@monash.edu.
  • Srikanth V; National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • Parker E; Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • Marsh L; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Beare R; National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • McNaney R; Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • Snowdon DA; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Qual Life Res ; 33(3): 619-636, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041742
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Limited examples exist of successful Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) implementation across an entire healthcare organisation. The aim of this study was to use a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a PROM collection system, which will inform implementation of routine collection of PROMs across an entire healthcare organisation.

METHODS:

Co-design comprised semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 11) and workshops/surveys with consumers (n = 320). The interview guide with clinicians focused on their experience using PROMs, preferences for using PROMs, and facilitators/barriers to using PROMs. Co-design activities specific to consumers focused on (1) how PROMs will be administered (mode), (2) when PROMs will be administered (timing), (3) who will assist with PROMs collection, and (4) how long a PROM will take to complete. Data were analysed using a manifest qualitative content analysis approach.

RESULTS:

Core elements identified during the co-design process included PROMs collection should be consumer-led and administered by someone other than a clinician; collection at discharge from the healthcare organisation and at 3-6 months post discharge would be most suitable for supporting comprehensive assessment; PROMs should be administered using a variety of modes to accommodate the diversity of consumer preferences, with electronic as the default; and the time taken to complete PROMs should be no longer than 5-10 min.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides new information on the co-design of a healthcare organisation-wide PROM collection system. Implementing a clinician and patient informed strategy for PROMs collection, that meets their preferences across multiple domains, should address known barriers to routine collection.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência ao Convalescente / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência ao Convalescente / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article